Project issue matrix

Fourteen issue types reviewed across the report’s 30 projects. Explore documented problems, constructive partnerships, and remaining gaps.

Rail construction equipment and works along the Hurontario corridor.
Hurontario light rail construction north of Highway 401, October 2023. Infrastructure context.

The 30 projects were chosen for what they can teach. The report groups 14 issue types into 10 patterns. These frequencies describe the selected projects, rather than all Canadian megaprojects.

The matrix records 179 documented problems and four constructive partnerships, excluded from problem totals. Thirty cells remain unresolved. No qualifying evidence does not prove that a problem never occurred.

  • ●Documented problem
  • ◆Constructive partnership
  • ?Unresolved evidence
  • n/aOutside boundary
  • ·No qualifying evidence established

CODE PRESENCE ≠ SINGLE-CAUSE ATTRIBUTION

Scroll the matrix horizontally to see every project; select an issue type to read its definition.

Code / Project
01Muskrat Falls02Site C03Trans Mountain Expansion04Coastal GasLink05Keeyask Generating Station06Darlington Refurbishment07Ottawa Confederation Line08Eglinton Crosstown LRT09Finch West LRT10Réseau express métropolitain11Valley Line West LRT12Samuel De Champlain Bridge13Gordie Howe International Bridge14CHUM Superhospital15Mary River Phase 216Canada Line17Romaine Hydroelectric Complex18Voisey's Bay19Mackenzie Gas20Energy East21Northern Gateway22Vancouver 2010 Winter Games23Pan Am 2015 Games24Toronto-York Spadina Subway25Sidewalk Toronto26Lower Mattagami River Project27Montréal 1976 Olympics28Stikine-Iskut29La Grande30Wreck Cove

Ten patterns, fourteen issue types

Each count covers projects with at least one issue type in the pattern. The Indigenous rights pattern includes 13 documented problems and four constructive partnerships.

  1. Optimistic baselines and unexpected ground conditions17/30
  2. Political pressure and weak governance21/30
  3. Indigenous rights and consultation17/30
  4. Regulatory delay, reversal and enforcement18/30
  5. Contractor productivity and unreliable commitments13/30
  6. Late scope and design change16/30
  7. Owner-contractor disputes15/30
  8. Quality defects and rework11/30
  9. External shocks23/30
  10. Systems integration and commissioning4/30

Ten recommendations to test

Chapter 8 proposes practices for different project stages. Their effectiveness needs to be tested on Canadian projects. This study does not establish that these recommendations will prevent the documented problems.

Procurement means choosing how the project will be delivered and selecting suppliers. Commissioning includes testing before operation. Contingency is money set aside in the budget for risks that are expected but not yet specific.

Summary of Chapter 8 and Table 10
StageProposed practiceLead
Before sanctionSet the baseline with an outside view and publish a rangeSponsoring government and owner board
Before sanctionRequire independent gateway review before sanctionTreasury board or equivalent
Before sanctionMake no public cost commitment before a business case is complete and publishedGovernments and ministers
Before sanctionTreat consent as a design inputOwner, rights-holders and regulators
ProcurementKeep a capable owner in charge of integrationOwner
ProcurementMatch the delivery model to the uncertaintyOwner and procurement agency
ProcurementWrite remedies and incentives that act earlyOwner and procurement agency
Delivery and commissioningSet clear authority over changes and over the release of contingencyOwner
Delivery and commissioningFix acceptance criteria and bring the operator in earlyOwner and operator
After completionPublish a post-completion reviewOwner and sponsoring government
01 · Front end13/30

Optimistic baseline

A source documents that the cost or schedule approved at sanction understated what similar work required, omitted known risks, or rested on assumptions later found untested.

Documented problems: 13

02 · Contract and delivery13/30

Contractor productivity and unreliable commitments

A source documents contractor productivity well below the tender or plan, or commitments on dates and sequences that proved unachievable.

Documented problems: 13

03 · Front end14/30

Ground conditions

A source documents foundation, soil or buried-infrastructure conditions that differed from the baseline assumptions and affected cost, schedule or design.

Documented problems: 14

06 · Front end13/30

Indigenous rights and consultation

A source documents consultation, accommodation, litigation or partnership with Indigenous nations shaped the project’s scope, schedule, approval or structure. Constructive partnerships are recorded separately and excluded from problem totals.

Documented problems: 13 · Partnerships excluded from totals: 4

07 · Front end21/30

Political pressure and weak governance

An inquiry, audit, review or peer-reviewed study documents political pressure on decisions or weak, divided or uninformed oversight, with a documented effect on the project.

Documented problems: 21

08 · Contract and delivery15/30

Owner-contractor disputes

A source documents a major claim, settlement, arbitration or lawsuit between owner and contractor during delivery.

Documented problems: 15

14 · Contract and delivery16/30

Late scope and design change

A source documents owner-, regulator- or site-driven changes to scope or design after contract award.

Documented problems: 16